Private physician consultation room at Waleerat International Clinic in Bangkok
Body contouring comparison · 2026·5 min read·2026-09-29

Body contouring: Ultraformer MPT vs XERF vs Thermage FLX: which tightens, which reduces fat?

In one paragraph

No source we found lets us call one of these three the device that dissolves fat, or the one that tightens skin best. Ultraformer MPT is a focused-ultrasound (HIFU) device; XERF and Thermage FLX are monopolar radiofrequency (RF) devices.

Reviews of the two technology families report modest body results, roughly 2 to 4.5 cm of circumference reduction across a course, and we found no study that compares the three. Body programs are priced separately and cannot be converted to the face.

Ultraformer MPT
HIFUfocused ultrasound
XERF
MonopolarRF, dual mode
Thermage FLX
MonopolarRF
Head-to-head trial
Nonefound

01The short answer — two goals, three machines, no proven winner

Body contouring mixes two goals: reducing the thickness of fat, and tightening loose skin. The sources below speak about technology families, not about a named machine, and none of them lets us say that one of these three does either job better than the others.

A claim that one of them dissolves fat and another tightens skin is not supported by the records we found.

Ultraformer MPT delivers focused ultrasound; the manufacturer lists a body cartridge range of 6.0, 9.0 and 13 mm depths beside its face cartridges. XERF and Thermage FLX heat tissue with monopolar radiofrequency and use surface cooling.

02The three at a glance — what each side is listed for, and what is missing

XERF and Thermage FLX are grouped because they share a technology family. The face and neck versions of these programs are compared in our face comparison.

Evidence-based comparison

How it works

Ultraformer MPT (HIFU)Focused ultrasound delivered at set depths; the maker lists body cartridges at 6.0, 9.0 and 13 mm.
XERF and Thermage FLX (monopolar RF)Radiofrequency current heats tissue, with surface cooling.

What the maker or regulator lists

Ultraformer MPT (HIFU)The maker's page lists skin laxity, sagging skin, wrinkles and skin-tone uses. It lists no fat reduction and no regulatory clearance.
XERF and Thermage FLX (monopolar RF)US FDA 510(k) K251327 lists XERF for electrocoagulation and hemostasis. K170758 lists Thermage FLX for wrinkles and, with vibration, temporary improvement in the appearance of cellulite.

Human evidence found

Ultraformer MPT (HIFU)A 2025 systematic review of HIFU (45 studies) reports body circumference reductions of about 2.5 to 4.5 cm, mainly in the abdomen and thighs. Nothing completed for Ultraformer MPT itself; the maker's registered trial of a related model covers the submental area and neck.
XERF and Thermage FLX (monopolar RF)A 2016 review of non-invasive body devices, including RF, reports mild to moderate effects, for example 2 to 4 cm of circumference reduction across a course. The XERF study we cite treated the face, not the body.

What this cannot tell you

Ultraformer MPT (HIFU)That it reduces fat or tightens body skin better or worse than the radiofrequency devices.
XERF and Thermage FLX (monopolar RF)That either reduces fat or tightens body skin better or worse than ultrasound, or than each other.

Found means found when this page was written. A gap is not a finding that a device lacks evidence or clearance elsewhere; the regulator records are US records.

03What the research says — and what it cannot

A 2025 systematic review of HIFU in skin tightening and body contouring (45 studies) reported skin-laxity improvements of 18 to 30 percent in the lower face, neck and eye area, and circumference reductions of 2.5 to 4.5 cm for the abdomen and thighs. Fewer than 5 percent of patients had transient redness, swelling or mild discomfort.

The authors say treatment protocols are not standardized and that long-term efficacy needs more research; the level of evidence is 3.

A 2016 review of non-invasive body contouring devices, including RF, HIFU and cryolipolysis, found statistically significant but mild to moderate effects, for example 2 to 4 cm of circumference reduction across a whole course, and no definitive non-invasive treatment for cellulite. Because the studies differ in method, it found comparing techniques difficult, and most participants had a BMI below 30.

Neither review compares these three devices, so the numbers describe technology families, not a promise for any one machine or person.

04Body programs and prices — body only, not interchangeable with the face

These are the clinic's standing catalogue prices for body programs, read from the price list and shown only while each price is valid. They are for body tightening only and cannot be converted to a face treatment, and terms are as set by the company.

A shot on one device is not the same as a shot on another.

  • Ultraformer MPT, body, 1,200 shots: ฿35,999
  • Ultraformer MPT, body, 2,400 shots: ฿69,999
  • Ultraformer MPT, body, 3,600 shots: ฿99,999
  • XERF, body, 900 shots: ฿55,999
  • XERF, body, 1,800 shots: ฿99,999
  • XERF, body, 3,600 shots: ฿189,999
  • Thermage FLX, body, 900 shots: ฿59,999
  • Thermage FLX, body, 1,500 shots: ฿79,999
  • Thermage FLX, body, 2,000 shots: ฿89,999

05Questions that decide it — before you choose a program

Start with the area and the goal: less fat thickness, tighter-looking skin, or both. A physician should say which of those the proposed device is meant to address for that area, and what would change the plan, including doing less.

  • Which area and which goal, fat thickness, skin laxity or both, is this device meant to address here?
  • What did the studies of this technology measure, and after how many sessions?
  • What is one shot here: which area, depth or mode, and how many are proposed? Shot counts are not comparable across devices.
  • What will I feel, what temporary redness or swelling should I expect, and when should I call?
  • Is this a body program? Body prices cannot be converted to the face.

Ready to talk to our doctor?

Send a photo or describe your concern on LINE — we'll suggest a treatment plan and price range before you visit.

CHAT ON LINE

06Common questions

Which one dissolves fat?+

No source we found lets us say that one of these three dissolves fat. Reviews of HIFU and RF as families report modest circumference reductions, and the US regulator records we found for XERF and Thermage FLX do not list fat reduction.

Ask what result is measured for your area, and how.

Which one tightens skin best?+

No head-to-head study was found. Ultrasound and radiofrequency are different technologies, and the closest research we found compared other devices on the face and saw no significant difference in a small sample.

See the face comparison.

Can I use a body price for my face?+

No. The body program prices are for body tightening only and cannot be converted to a face treatment.

How many sessions do I need, and how long do results last?+

We found no source that gives a reliable number of sessions or a reliable duration for these three devices, so we do not state either. Reviews describe results across a course of sessions, note that protocols are not standardized, and say long-term efficacy needs more research.

08References & further reading

  1. A Systematic Review of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Skin Tightening and Body Contouring, Aesthetic Surgery Journal 202545 studies; body circumference reductions of about 2.5 to 4.5 cm in the abdomen and thighs; protocols not standardized; long-term efficacy needs more research.
  2. Review of the Mechanisms and Effects of Noninvasive Body Contouring Devices on Cellulite and Subcutaneous Fat, 2016RF, HIFU, cryolipolysis and others; mild to moderate effects, for example 2 to 4 cm circumference reduction across a course; no definitive non-invasive cellulite treatment; techniques hard to compare.
  3. CLASSYS — Ultraformer MPT product pageManufacturer statements on face and body cartridges and indications; the page states no regulatory clearance and cites no clinical paper.
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07229430 — Ultraformer MPT PLUS versus Ulthera, submental and neckSponsor-registered randomized non-inferiority study of a related model in the submental area and neck; recruiting at the time of writing.
  5. FDA 510(k) K251327 — XERFUS record listing electrocoagulation and hemostasis as the indication; no clinical tests were submitted.
  6. FDA 510(k) K170758 — Thermage FLX System and AccessoriesUS record listing wrinkles and, with vibration, temporary improvement in the appearance of cellulite among its indications.

External sources · last verified 2026-09-29

Available at our branches
Flagship · BTS Siam
Siam Square One

Siam Square One flagship — opposite Siam Paragon, skywalk from BTS Siam Exit 3, in the CBD heart of Bangkok (Pathum Wan). 1-minute walk from BTS.

226/1 Rama 1 Road, 2F, Pathum Wan District, Bangkok 10330 — Siam Square One, opposite Siam Paragon · BTS Siam Exit 3
Walking distance to
  • ●BTS Siam (Exit 3)1m
  • ●Siam Paragon2m
  • ●Siam Discovery3m
  • ●Siam Center3m
  • ●Siam Kempinski Hotel4m
  • ●MBK Center5m
  • ●Chulalongkorn University8m
View on Google Maps →
← Back to journal

Begin with a conversation.

A 30–45 minute physician consultation is complimentary. We'll listen first — discuss your goals, then decide together whether any procedure is right for you.